www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global General

Special

Newsmaker

Asia Pacific

America

Middle East

Europe

Africa

Treasury's Paulson: Must preserve bailout funds

(Agencies)
Updated: 2008-11-18 23:58

WASHINGTON -- Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson on Tuesday said the unpredictable nature of the current financial crisis meant it was necessary to ensure that financial bailout money was not diverted to other uses.

US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (L) and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testify at the House Financial Services Committee hearing on "Oversight of Implementation of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and of Government Lending and Insurance Facilities; Impact on Economy and Credit Availability" on Capitol Hill in Washington November 18, 2008. [Agencies]

In testimony prepared for delivery to the US House Financial Services Committee, Paulson said the $700-billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, was intended to shore up the financial system and said there were other efforts under way to help homeowners avoid preventable foreclosures.

Related readings:  Paulson's plan reversal hurts credibility  Paulson says troubled assets will not be purchased  Paulson's rescue plan cash looks just like debt but in drag  Paulson pledges strong actions to deal with crisis

"While I understand the interest in spending TARP resources on other approaches, the efforts already under way will do more to prevent foreclosures than might have been achieved through very large purchases of mortgage-related securities through the TARP," he said.

Paulson faces a grilling over a decision to use TARP funds for recapitalizing financial institutions instead of buying bad or so-called toxic assets as was originally proposed.

He said that by the time Congress had approved the funds, the financial crisis had gone global and become so severe that "an asset purchase program would not be effective enough, quickly enough."

Paulson said the financial bailout was not intended as a stimulus package. "It was intended to shore up the foundation of our economy by stabilizing the financial system, and it is unrealistic to expect it to reverse the damage that had already been inflicted by the severity of the crisis."