www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

WORLD> Asia-Pacific
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case
(Agencies)
Updated: 2009-09-07 11:52

 

US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case
German colonel Georg Klein is pictured at the German base in Kunduz, Afghanistan, Sunday, Sept. 6, 2009. [Agencies]
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case

KABUL: An airstrike by US fighter jets that appears to have killed Afghan civilians could turn into a major dispute for NATO allies Germany and the United States, as tensions began rising between them Sunday over Germany's role in ordering the attack.

Afghan officials say up to 70 people were killed in the early morning airstrike Friday in the northern province of Kunduz after Taliban militants stole two tanker trucks of fuel and villagers gathered to siphon off gas.

Afghan and NATO investigations are just beginning, but both German and US officials already appeared to be trying to deflect blame.

German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said the Taliban's possession of the two tankers "posed an acute threat to our soldiers." German officials have said the tankers might have been used as suicide bombs.

"If there were civilian casualties or injuries, of course we deeply regret that. At the same time, it was clear that our soldiers were in danger," Jung said in comments to German broadcasters. "Consequently, I stand clearly behind our commander's decision" to order the air strike.

Full coverage:
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case Afghan Presidential Election

Related readings:
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case Pakistan kills 43 militants in strikes
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case 
NATO airstrike in Afghanistan
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case US takes steps to deport alleged Nazi to Germany
US-German rift emerges over Afghan deaths case Germany to plead for US bailout of Opel

Meanwhile, Rear Adm. Gregory J. Smith, the top US and NATO spokesman in the country, said German troops let too many hours pass before visiting the site of the bombing Friday.

He explained that it's important to hold the ground after a strike and determine what happened before the enemy comes out with its own version of events.

The top US and NATO commander in Afghanistan, US Gen. Stanley McChrystal, visited the site Saturday where two charred trucks and yellow gas cans sat on a riverbed. He asked a top commander in Regional Command North about the response time.

"Why didn't RC-North come here quicker?" McChrystal asked Col. Georg Klein, the commander of the German base in Kunduz.

"I can honestly say it was a mistake," Klein answered, in a discussion witnessed by an Associated Press reporter.

On Sunday, Smith said that in McChrystal's judgment the response time "was probably longer than it should have been."

German troops in Afghanistan have long been criticized for avoiding combat operations, even as militants have increasingly infiltrated northern Afghanistan the last year, destabilizing the once-peaceful region.

Taliban militants stole two fuel tankers late Friday that became stuck on a riverbed outside Kunduz. Villagers — either forced by the militants or enticed by offers of free fuel — gathered near the trucks, even as US jets patrolled overhead.

German commanders watching images from the US aircraft could see about 120 people, McChrystal said Saturday. The commanders decided that the people were militants and ordered the airstrikes, Smith said, even though images provided by the US aircraft would have been grainy and difficult to see.

Whether the German commanders or the US pilot are at fault for any civilian casualties may turn into an inner-NATO tussle.

Smith said the ground force commander "is the decision maker for close air support. That's doctrine." But he also conceded that a pilot can refuse an order to drop a bomb.

Klein, in an interview with The Associated Press on Sunday, declined to say whether images provided by the US jets had been clear enough for weapons to be seen among Afghans on the ground, citing the ongoing investigation.

A German Joint Terminal Air Controller, or JTAC, who spoke on condition that his name not be used because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly, said the rules for ordering an attack clearly state that the ultimate decision rests with the ground commander.

But rules also require that both the pilot and the JTAC get a good positive identification of the target before the commander can order a weapon deployed, the JTAC said.

"Only when both are sure that what we see is a target, only then will the pilot drop the bomb," the JTAC said.

The German Defense Ministry, meanwhile, pushed back against a story published in the Washington Post that German officials said painted their commander in a poor light and played up the US version of events. The ministry said the article "will definitely influence at least the preliminary investigation by the various bodies."

"The Defense Ministry is very surprised about the unusual procedure of using a journalist as a source to reveal initial investigation results," the ministry said.

Kris Coratti, director of communications for the Washington Post, said in an e-mail: "The story speaks for itself."

Smith said a trip to Kunduz by military officials from Kabul was not an official investigation but a fact-finding trip.

"And I think it's much, much better for people to understand the facts," he said of the decision to allow a journalist to witness the discussion among military officials.

No NATO officials will yet say how many civilians they think may have died. Smith on Saturday said the preliminary overall death toll was believed to be 56. Afghan officials say it's in the low 70s.

Smith said he hopes a US-German rift does not develop over the strike. "I hope everyone allows the investigation to proceed and we'll determine what we know more precisely and move on from there," Smith said.

The director of an Afghan human rights group criticized NATO's International Security Assistance Force for the deaths. "It was carelessness in terms of ISAF using force without doing enough to investigate whether this is a civilian location," Ajmal Samadi of Afghan Rights Monitor said.

German troops have long been criticized for restrictions that limit the battle their troops see. A US based military analyst, Anthony Cordesman, said German troops don't have "the situational and combat experience" to confront Taliban on the ground.

"They're as oriented toward staying in their armored vehicles as any group I've met," Cordesman said. "They're not active enough to present much of a threat to the Taliban most of the time."

Klein rejected the claim that his troops lacked combat experience.

"Since I arrived here we have unfortunately seen many combat situations and my soldiers performed very well," he said.

"But the thing that's always given us a very good reputation in the civilian society here is that we tried as best as possible to exclude any civilian casualties, and I've got very good feedback on that from the Afghan people," he said.

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久在线 | 91精品人成在线观看 | 成年人黄色免费网站 | 男人的天堂在线精品视频 | 国产精品aⅴ | 国产精品免费一区二区三区 | 在线精品亚洲 | 一级一片免费看 | 波多野结衣在线观看免费区 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区二区精品 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全软件 | 香港日本韩国三级网站 | 欧美性色一级在线观看 | 模特视频一二三区 | 成人毛片免费观看视频 | 亚洲欧美二区三区久本道 | 成年人免费的视频 | 大片毛片女女女女女女女 | 男女乱淫真视频免费一级毛片 | 久久国产午夜精品理论片34页 | 亚洲精品毛片久久久久久久 | 天堂免费在线视频 | a级精品九九九大片免费看 a级毛片免费观看网站 | 成人欧美一区二区三区在线 | 免费一级毛片在线观看 | 亚洲午夜久久久久影院 | 国产精品v欧美精品v日本精 | 萌白酱福利视频 | 日韩美女一区二区三区 | 久久久久日韩精品无 | 成人免费毛片网站 | 成人亚洲精品一区二区 | 日韩一级欧美一级毛片在线 | 一区二区三区日韩精品 | 国产三a级日本三级日产三级 | 亚洲一区二区三区香蕉 | 国产午夜精品不卡视频 | 欧洲免费无线码一二区 | 亚洲精品影院久久久久久 | 国产成人综合亚洲一区 | 97免费视频在线 |