www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
World / Asia-Pacific

Chinese embassy rebuts NY Times editorial on China-Philippines dispute

(Xinhua) Updated: 2015-07-30 09:55

Chinese embassy rebuts NY Times editorial on China-Philippines dispute

Chinese marine surveillance ship Yuzheng 206 carries out regular patrols in the territorial waters surrounding the Diaoyu Islands on March 24. [Photo/Xinhua]

BEIJING - The Chinese Embassy in Washington has called the New York Times' July 17 editorial on the China-Philippines dispute over the South China Sea unfair, stressing that China's approach toward this issue is to hold direct bilateral negotiations.

In a letter published Tuesday in the New York Times, the embassy's Press Counselor and Spokesman Zhu Haiquan said that the editorial titled "The South China Sea, in Court" about the arbitration case raised by the Philippines over rights to the South China Sea, is "not fair."

"China, a latecomer to land reclamation, has been exercising utmost restraint. But the status quo has long been broken by the Philippines and some other claimants, which built facilities, including military ones, on the reefs owned by China," Zhu said.

"China calls on relevant parties to shelve their differences and engage in joint development in the South China Sea. Actually in 2005, China, the Philippines and Vietnam conducted joint marine seismic survey in some areas of the sea. It would have set a good precedent if the Philippine government had not changed its mind," the official said.

"China's approach toward solving the South China Sea issue is to have direct dialogue and negotiation between claimants, which is more effective and sustainable. China and the Philippines had tried such talks before, but the Philippine side unilaterally stopped them in 2012," the diplomat said. "Our door remains open, and we are engaged with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in establishing a code of conduct to ensure peace and stability in the South China Sea until the disputes are settled."

"The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea gives no country the legal right to extend its exclusive economic zone to other country's territories. We do not believe that the arbitration court has jurisdiction, and as a member of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, China is entitled to exclude any third-party compulsory settlement," he said.

On July 17, the New York Times released an editorial written by its editorial board, saying that "a courtroom in The Hague has become an important new battleground in the multinational struggle over the resource-rich South China Sea" and that the Philippines "can qualify to have 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zones."

Trudeau visits Sina Weibo
May gets little gasp as EU extends deadline for sufficient progress in Brexit talks
Ethiopian FM urges strengthened Ethiopia-China ties
Yemen's ex-president Saleh, relatives killed by Houthis
Most Popular
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线a视频网站 | aaa免费视频 | 久久亚洲私人国产精品 | 特级aa一级欧美毛片 | 日本一区二区三区四区不卡 | 中国成人免费视频 | 免费国产视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品www久久久久久久软件 | 亚洲综合视频网 | 久久99精品久久久久久国产越南 | 久久精品国产99精品最新 | 国产一区二区久久精品 | 欧美精品另类 | 韩国福利影视一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久久毛片 | 国产精品99 | 一区二区三区免费观看 | 国产成人一区二区在线不卡 | 在线国产日韩 | 国产成人在线看 | 在线国产一区 | 可以免费看黄的网站 | 欧美视频在线观看网站 | 国产第一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产精品色内内在线播放 | 日本色哟哟 | 日韩美女强理论片 | 全国男人的天堂天堂网 | 亚洲日本va午夜中文字幕一区 | 69国产成人综合久久精品91 | 日本aaaa级| 亚洲精品推荐 | 欧美日一区| 久久精品全国免费观看国产 | 久久国产a | 久久精品国产精品青草 | 第一色区 | 鲁一鲁色一色 | 久久久国产精品免费视频 | 欧美成人三级伦在线观看 | 国产成人福利视频在线观看 |