久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

   
 
The protection of design on printed flat works
( )

Q1: Can printed flat works be protected under the Patent Law as a design?

A: No. Paragraph (f) of Article 25 of the Patent Law provides that, no patent right shall be granted to a design which is used primarily for the identification of pattern, color or the combination of the two on printed flat works. Section 6.2 of Chapter 3 of Part One of Guidelines for Patent Examination (2010) makes a further stipulation that where an application for a patent for design meets the following three requirements, the application falls under Article 25.1(6) and no patent right shall be granted: (1) the product for which the design is applied is a plane printed matter; (2) the design is made of patterns, colors, or their combination; and (3) the design serves mainly as indicator. The so-called “serves mainly as an indicator” states that the main purpose of design is to make it convenient for the public to identify the products involved, the origin of service, etc.

Q2: Do you think it useful to submit a reference view of the state in use when the purpose of the application is just for reference and it will not be included in the scope of protection as a design under the application?

A: Although the submission of a reference view of the state in use will not enlarge the scope of protection for a design, it may be helpful and make it easier for the examiner to understand the design because it is generally used to indicate the use of the product of the design. In addition, determining whether the comparative design constitutes a conflicting application for the patent concerned must be made in accordance with all of the content of the published comparative design. For example, if the published comparative design includes reference view of the state in use, even though the reference view of the state in use contains design which has not been claimed, the nonclaimed design could be used to help make a comparison with the patent concerned to decide whether they are identical or substantially identical.

Q3: I am from a U.S. company. We have a product for which we applied for a patent for a design. Now we want to apply for the protection of the design in China. However, there is no longer a six-month priority period. Should we apply for a patent in China?

A: Firstly, the U.S. patent system is different from that of China. In the United States, novelty of creation or invention shall not be affected, even if it has been published or used in public, bought out, or sold within one year before the date of the application. However, the law of China upholds absolute novelty, which means that the design for patent shall not belong to the prior art. According to Section 2.1 of Chapter 3 of Part Two of Guidelines for Patent Examination (2010) the prior art includes any technology which has been disclosed in publications in China or abroad, or has been publicly used or made known to the public by any other means in China or abroad, before the date of filing (or the priority date where priority is claimed). Therefore, if your design has already been published or used in public before the date of filing in U.S., its novelty shall be affected when applying for a patent for design in China. Similarly, the publication of an application in the U.S. will also have an adverse impact on its novelty in China. In conclusion, if the priority period of six months has passed, it may be granted a patent for design provided that you submit your application without priority as soon as possible and that its novelty can be satisfied, namely, it has not been published (including the publication of the application for a patent in the U.S.) and used.

(Answered by Xing Yue, Patent Attorney of LuSheng Law Firm)



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

JETRO: A decade of development in China

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本高清视频一区二区 | 久久国产精品夜色 | 日韩精品视频美在线精品视频 | 欧美成人中文字幕 | 色悠久| 国产欧美成人xxx视频 | 欧美成人免费高清视频 | 久久综合香蕉久久久久久久 | 日本一区深夜影院深a | 毛片手机在线视频免费观看 | 日本加勒比视频在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久无码av | 色一伦一情一区二区三区 | 国产人成亚洲第一网站在线播放 | 日本手机在线视频 | 曰韩毛片| 日韩欧美亚洲综合久久99e | 一级欧美一级日韩毛片99 | 毛片在线免费观看网站 | 日韩精品一区二区三区毛片 | 一级做a爰片久久毛片看看 一级做a爰片久久毛片鸭王 | 最新亚洲精品国自产在线观看 | 亚洲天堂免费观看 | 久草手机在线观看视频 | 欧美日本综合一区二区三区 | 天海翼精品久久中文字幕 | 日韩美女视频网站 | 久草免费手机视频 | 国产成人精品久久综合 | 男女男精品视频免费观看 | 欧美透逼 | 久久精品免费一区二区视 | 亚洲一区二区精品 | 亚洲无线一二三区2021 | 亚洲综合色dddd26 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区久久 | 久久香焦 | 国产高清在线精品免费 | 亚洲国产一区在线 | 黄色在线网站 |